It was unfair to expect a public sector whistleblower to act in good faith and in the public interest without UK equivalent continued monthly pay until a reported whistleblowing issue was proved with a tribunal judgment to be able to afford to act in the public interest. HM AG Chambers has unlimited funding and blatantly operates an unpublished anti-whistleblowing policy to win cases at any ethical cost and at any financial cost to protect the guilty and to conceal countless iniquitous legal opinions that are only able to be iniquitous with intimidation and with relentless ruthless actions and inactions to batter and to immorally seek to professionally, financially, emotionally and medically crush hero after hero with impunity.
The primary legislation Employment (Amendment) Act 2024 added UK equivalent whistleblower salary interim relief.
The secondary legislation order SD 2024/0253 drafted 14th November 2024 and progressed via Tynwald on 21st January 2025 started the whistleblower salary protection mechanism with effect from 1st April 2025. The unbudgeted new legislation compliance was pushed into the next financial year.
https://www.tynwald.org.im/spfile?file=/business/opqp/sittings/20212026/2024-SD-0253.pdf
Why is the finalised order the only order missing in the HM AG Chambers legislation website Employment Act 2006 section?
https://legislation.gov.im/cms/legislation/current/by-title.html
select E
scroll down to Employment Act 2006
Why is the finalised order the only order missing in the Tynwald Library legislation website between SD 2024/0252 and SD 2024/0254 given it is 452 days since the draft order was filed in a Tynwald sitting?
https://tynwald.org.im/links/secondary-legislation#2024
Why would the Isle of Man OHR public sector whistleblowing policy fail to include adequate explanatory notes and the process map steps to successfully claim whistleblower salary interim relief within 7 days of a termination date?
https://hr.gov.im/media/3004/whistleblowing-policy-final-v32-jan-2026_compressed.pdf
Why would the industrial relations explanatory notes not highlight the existence of the whistleblower salary protection mechanism or highlight the risk of an already almost impossible deadline to successfully claim salary interim relief within 7 days of a termination date?
https://www.mirs.org.im/whistleblowing/
A link to Department for Enterprise explanatory notes does include reference to public sector whistleblower salary interim relief. However, the legislation is interpreted to prioritise re-instatement or re-engagement in an untenable role with the same employer hostile to the whistleblowing issue that necessitated a protected disclosure and tribunal claim in the first place rather than automatically allow continued pay until the whistleblowing issue is decided.
https://www.mirs.org.im/media/pombpy0x/whistleblowing-guide-29-january-2026-update.pdf
Why would the Isle of Man tribunal claim form not highlight the existence of whistleblower salary interim relief or include a simple tickbox to help a public sector whistleblower successfully claim salary interim relief within 7 days of a termination date? The UK equivalent tribunal form helps public sector whistleblowers.
https://www.courts.im/media/2243/downloadable-complaint-form.pdf
Why would the Isle of Man tribunal claim form explanatory notes below the complaint form not highlight the urgent need to successfully claim salary interim relief within 7 days of a termination date? The UK equivalent explanatory notes help public sector whistleblowers.
It is not enough to simply state the explanatory notes “do not purport to be a complete or definitive statement of the law” and let public sector whistleblowers then fail to successfully claim salary interim relief within 7 days of a termination date.
A generic employment rights section on the Isle of Man Government website does reference interim relief but the claim form and the claim form explanatory notes should reflect the legislation amendments.
Question: Do you think 0 or more than 0 public sector whistleblowers successfully claimed and obtained whistleblower salary interim relief in the 382 days since it started and do you think the tribunal chair would be aware it is 0 if it is 0 and be able to explain why it is 0 if it is 0?
I happen to have unmatched cumulative insights into public sector whistleblowing issues. I filed a submission with the Select Committee on Whistleblowing Policy Implementation but I was not allowed to give evidence perhaps because I know too much. I will issue a response to the final report to highlight the truth overlooked by the select committee.
Tynwald Papers 